The Lidar and photogrammetry shooting is globaly a success, proving simple and affordable tools such as Android and Apple smartphones are able to produce quick usable 3D models for basic measurements and museography drafting. Some limitations appeared though, wich need to be listed and used in project planning and scheduling :

1. No native Apps are provided by hardware manufacturers, 3rd party apps are required, but the offer is plethorus and accurate choice can be a jungle
2. Apple LiDar offers the most quick and easy worksflow with intuitive user interface including live vision of surfaces mapped vs surfaces yet unknown to the device. Production cycle
3. Even with matte surface and homogeneous lighting, some object features are tricky for system reconstruction, like perfectly cylindrical barrels (such as canons)  and aerial bars and wires (such as angle iron) only attached to the main body of the object via extremity contact points. Post processed Photogrammetry does better job on this than Apple LiDar.
4. With the same Devices : Different apps produce different results, one single app may not cover all cases alone, algorithms are the key here, but invisible to the digitization operator before final compilation result. Therefore the choice of an app for a regular production cycle may consider quality of rendering algorithms depending on two main factors :
   1. Duration of the capture (auto-pointcloud decimation may be an issue on some devices)
   2. Size of the Objet scanned (large objects take more time, then are more subject to decimation quality downgrade risk)
5. Obvious but still worth mentionning : Local Rendering shows quicker limits than cloud post-processing. Said differently : results obtained directly on Phone ou Tablet in 10 minutes are usually far less accurate than results obtained after letting the device upload all data to a High performance Cloud Computing Service wich usually delivers better quality results in 30minutes to 3 hours. Therefore being able to select the option "keep the raw data" while capturing is a must-have. Some apps simply doesn't allow local post-processing (such as KIRI Engine) and some apps doesn't allow external reprocessing (such as Scanniverse). 
6. Even with practical and immediate applications, Captured 3D models from reality in complex environments such as Museum Showroom must not be considered scientifically accurate beyond a certain point (non-homogeneous lighting, color deviation, reflections, lack of space for distance capture consistency, algoritmic interpretation distorsion...) and thus may at least be CLEANED in a desktop 3D editing software as part of the regular workflow. Timings for this to follow.